1. LON-CAPA Logo
  2. Help
  3. Log In
 

Abstracts of Selected Publications

Lindsay, S.M., Frank, T.M., Kent, J., Partridge, J.C., and M.I. Latz. 1999. 
Spectral sensitivity of vision and bioluminescence in the midwater 
shrimp, Sergestes similis. Biological Bulletin 197(3).
In the oceanic midwater environment, many fish, squid, and shrimp use luminescent 
countershading to remain cryptic to silhouette-scanning predators. The midwater 
penaeid shrimp, Sergestes similis Hansen, responds to downward-directed light 
with a dim bioluminescence that dynamically matches the spectral radiance of oceanic 
downwelling light at depth. Although the sensory basis of luminescent countershading 
behavior is visual, the relationship between visual and behavioral sensitivity is 
poorly understood. In this study, visual spectral sensitivity, based on 
microspectrophotometry and electrophysiological measurements of photoreceptor 
response, is directly compared to the behavioral spectral efficiency of luminescent 
countershading. Microspectrophotometric measurements on single photoreceptors 
revealed only a single visual pigment with peak absorbance at 495 nm in the 
blue-green region of the spectrum. The peak electrophysiological spectral 
sensitivity of dark-adapted eyes was centered at about 500 nm. The spectral 
efficiency of luminescent countershading showed a broad peak from 480 to 520 nm. 
Both electrophysiological and behavioral data closely matched the normalized 
spectral absorptance curve of a rhodopsin with lmax = 495 nm, when rhabdom length 
and photopigment specific absorbance were considered. The close coupling between 
visual spectral sensitivity and the spectral efficiency of luminescent 
countershading attests to the importance of bioluminescence as a camouflage strategy
in this species.

Latz, M.I. and J. Rohr. 1999.
Luminescent response of the red tide dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum 
to laminar and turbulent flow. Limnology and Oceanography 44: 1423-1435.
While it is universally accepted that plankton continually experience a dynamic
fluid environment, their sensitivity to the features of the surrounding flow 
field at the relevant length and time scales of the organism is poorly
characterized. The present study uses bioluminescence as a tool to understand 
how the red tide dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum (=Gonyaulax 
polyedra) responds to well characterized hydrodynamic forces present in 
fully developed laminar and turbulent pipe flow. The response of L. polyedrum 
to hydrodynamic stimulation was best characterized by wall shear stress; at 
similar values of wall shear stress the response was similar for laminar and 
turbulent flows.

The response threshold occurred in laminar flow at a wall shear stress of 
approximately 0.3 N m^-2. At these low flow rates, video analysis of the 
velocity of flash trajectories revealed that responding cells were positioned 
only near the pipe wall, where local shear stress levels were equal or greater 
than threshold. For cell concentrations ranging over four orders of magnitude, 
threshold values of wall shear stress were restricted to a narrow range, 
consistent with an antipredation function for dinoflagellate bioluminescence. 
For laminar flows with above-threshold wall shear stress values < 1 N m^-2, 
mean bioluminescence increased with wall shear stress according to a power 
(log-log) relationship, with the slope of the power function dependent on cell 
concentration. The increase in bioluminescence within this range was due primarily 
to an increasing population response rate, and to a lesser extent an increase in 
maximum flash intensity per cell and the increased flux of organisms with higher 
flow rates. For wall shear stress levels greater than 1 N m^-2, the maximum 
intensity per cell remained approximately constant with increasing wall shear 
stress, even as the flow transitioned from laminar to turbulent, and the smallest 
turbulent length scales became less than the average cell size.

Rohr, J., M.I. Latz, S. Fallon, J.C. Nauen, and E. Hendricks. 1998. 
Experimental approaches towards interpreting dolphin-stimulated bioluminescence. 
Journal of Experimental Biology 201: 1447-1460. 
Flow-induced bioluminescence provides a unique opportunity for visualizing the flow 
field around a swimming dolphin. Unfortunately, previous descriptions of 
dolphin-stimulated bioluminescence have been largely anecdotal and often 
conflicting. Most references in the scientific literature report an absence of 
bioluminescence on the dolphin body, which has been invariably assumed to be 
indicative of laminar flow. However, hydrodynamicists have yet to find compelling 
evidence that the flow remains laminar over most of the body. The present study 
integrates laboratory, computational and field approaches to begin to assess the 
utility of using bioluminescence as a method for flow visualization by relating 
fundamental characteristics of the flow to the stimulation of naturally occurring 
luminescent plankton.

Laboratory experiments using fully-developed pipe flow revealed that the 
bioluminescent organisms identified in the field studies can be stimulated in both 
laminar and turbulent flow when shear stress values exceeded approximately 0.1 
N/m^2. Computational studies of an idealized hydrodynamic representation of a 
dolphin (modeled as a 6:1 ellipsoid), gliding at a speed of 2 m/s, predicted 
suprathreshold surface shear stress values everywhere on the model, regardless of 
whether the boundary layer flow was laminar or turbulent. Laboratory flow 
visualization of a sphere demonstrated that the intensity of bioluminescence 
decreased with increasing flow due to the thinning of the boundary layer, while flow
 separation caused a dramatic increase due to the significantly greater volume of 
stimulating flow in the wake. Intensified video recordings of dolphins gliding at 
speeds of approximately 2 m/s confirmed that brilliant displays of bioluminescence 
occurred on the body of the dolphin. The distribution and intensity of 
bioluminescence suggest that the flow remained attached over most of the body. A 
conspicuous lack of bioluminescence was often observed on the dolphin rostrum, melon 
and the leading edge of the dorsal and pectoral fins, where the boundary layer is 
thought to be the thinnest. To differentiate between effects related to the 
thickness of the stimulatory boundary layer and those due to the latency of the 
bioluminescence response and the upstream depletion of bioluminescence, laboratory 
and dolphin studies of forced separation and laminar to turbulent transition were 
conducted. The observed pattern of stimulated bioluminescence is consistent with the 
hypothesis that bioluminescent intensity is directly related to the thickness of the 
boundary layer. 


Rohr, J., J. Allen, J. Losee, and M.I. Latz. 1997. 
The use of bioluminescence as a flow diagnostic. 
Physics Letters A 228: 408-416. 
The flash response of luminescent plankton is studied in 
laminar and turbulent pipe flow. Maximum intensity levels 
of individual plankton are nearly constant for wall shear 
stress values exceeding approximately 10 dyn/cm2 -- regardless 
of the nature of the flow. This result necessitates a reevaluation 
of previous inferences made about the stimulating flow field. 


Omori, M., M.I. Latz, H. Fukami, and M. Wada. 1996. New 
observations on the bioluminescence of the pelagic shrimp Sergia 
lucens (Hansen, 1922). pp. 175-184. In: Zooplankton: Sensory Ecology 
and Physiology. P.H. Lenz, D.K. Hartline, J.E. Purcell, and D.L. Macmillan, eds. 
Gordon and Breach Publishers, Amsterdam.
Bioluminescence of the sergestid shrimp, Sergia lucens, was confirmed 
experimentally. To the unaided eye, light emission was oriented downward 
as a dim glow which originated from the ventral and lateral body surfaces. 
Image intensification revealed that this steady glow actually consisted of 
scintillating sources. Photophores first appear at 4.3 mm in carapace 
length (CL), and increase in number with growth. The arrangement is completed 
when the shrimp is sexually mature at 9.3 mm CL. The number of photophores 
of adults ranges between 158 and 169. Physiological mechanisms controlling 
the light emission are unknown. Gentle prodding of the body and electrical 
stimulation were ineffective, and there was very little response to serotonin 
treatment. The most effective stimuli were a strobe light flash and eyestalk 
crushing. Although the average emission measured from ovigerous females was 
approximately twice that from males, the differences in bioluminescence according 
to gender or reproductive conditions were not statistically significant.


Latz, M.I., and H.J. Jeong. 1996. Effect of red tide 
dinoflagellate diet on the bioluminescence of the heterotrophic dinoflagellate, 
Protoperidinium spp. Marine Ecology Progress Series 132: 275-285.
The effects of diet and cannibalism were assessed from changes in the 
bioluminescence potential of two species of the heterotrophic 
dinoflagellate Protoperidinium fed on 4 species of red tide dinoflagellate 
prey, and with no added prey. The use of bioluminescence as a sensitive 
indicator of nutritional status and feeding was explored. The 
bioluminescence of Protoperidinium cf. divergens and P. crassipes 
was significantly affected by dinoflagellate diet. Total 
mechanically stimulable luminescence (TMSL) of P. cf. divergens 
fed different dinoflagellate diets was significantly correlated 
with feeding frequency (the percent of feeding P. cf. divergens 
cells) rather than with population growth rate. P. cf. divergens 
displayed high levels of TMSL and feeding frequency on a diet of 
Scrippsiella trochoidea which did not support population growth. 
Diet did not affect the total number of flashes produced per cell; 
therefore changes in TMSL with dinoflagellate diet were related to 
the amount of chemical substrate available for luminescence, 
rather than changes in the excitation/transduction process. 
Individually isolated cells remained viable for only 3 - 5 days 
without food, and exhibited reduced bioluminescence. However, 
cells maintained in groups survived at least 16 days ithout added 
prey and maintained levels of bioluminescence similar to those 
during favorable prey conditions. Cannibalism observed during this 
time may have enabled cells of Protoperidinium cf. divergens to 
feed and therefore produce high levels of bioluminescence in the 
absence of added prey. Changes in swimming speed were less than 
changes in bioluminescence. The results of the present study 
suggest that energy utilization may be prioritized in the 
following order: swimming (for grazing) > bioluminescence (for 
reducing predation) > reproduction (for increasing the 
population). 


Latz, M.I. 1995. Physiological mechanisms in the control of 
bioluminescent countershading in a midwater shrimp. Journal of Marine and 
Freshwater Physiology and Behavior 26: 207-218.
In the oceanic midwater environment, most animals have evolved an extraordinary 
anti-predation behavior using bioluminescent countershading 
(counterillumination) to help them remain cryptic to visual 
predators. For the midwater penaeid shrimp, Sergestes similis, the 
interaction of both hormonal and neural systems may be involved in 
the control of counterillumination. S. similis responds to 
downward-directed illumination, detected by the eyes, with light 
emission from five hepatic light organs. Dark-adapted specimens 
undergo a slow induction process prior to production of the 
conventional counterillumination response. The induction of 
bioluminescence may involve a hormonal pathway mediated by the 
light-adapting retinal distal pigment dispersing hormone. Once 
induced, the rapid control of counterillumination may involve a 
neural pathway. Because counterilluminating animals directly 
respond to their optical environment, an understanding of the 
control of bioluminescence provides an insight into the poorly 
understood visual processing capabilities of deep-sea animals. 


Latz, M.I. and A.O. Lee. 1995. Spontaneous and stimulated 
bioluminescence of the dinoflagellate, Ceratocorys horrida 
(Peridiniales). Journal of Phycology 31: 120-132.
This is the first report of spontaneous bioluminescence in the autotrophic 
dinoflagellate, Ceratocorys horrida von Stein. Bioluminescence was 
measured, using an automated data acquisition system, in a strain 
of cultured cells isolated from the Sargasso Sea. Ceratocorys 
horrida is only the second dinoflagellate species to exhibit 
rhythmicity in the rate of spontaneous flashing, flash quantum 
flux (intensity), and level of spontaneous glowing. The rate of 
spontaneous flashing was maximal during hours 2 - 4 of the dark 
phase [i.e. circadian time (CT)16-18 for a 14:10 h light:dark 
cycle (LD10:14)], with approximately 2% of the population 
flashing.min-1, a rate approximately one order of magnitude 
greater than that of the dinoflagellate, Gonyaulax polyedra. Flash 
quantum flux was also maximal during this period. Spontaneous 
flashes were 134 ms in duration with a maximum flux (intensity) of 
3.1 x 109 quanta.s-1. Light emission presumably originated from 
blue fluorescent microsources distributed in the cell periphery 
and not from the spines. Values of both spontaneous flash rate and 
maximum flux were independent of cell concentration. Isolated 
cells also produced spontaneous flashes. Spontaneous glowing was 
dim except for a peak of 6.4 x 104 quanta.s-1.cell-1 which 
occurred at CT22.9 for LD14:10 and at CT22.8 for LD12:12. The 
total integrated emission of spontaneous flashing and 
glowing during the dark phase was 4 x 109 quanta.cell-1, 
equivalent to the total stimulable luminescence (TSL). The rhythms 
for C. horrida flash and glow behavior were similar to those of 
Gonyaulax polyedra, although flash rate and quantum flux were 
greater. Spontaneous bioluminescence in C. horrida may be a 
circadian rhythm because it persisted for at least three cycles in 
constant dark conditions. This is also the first detailed study of 
the stimulated bioluminescence of C. horrida, which also displayed 
a diurnal rhythm. Cultures exhibited > 200 times more mechanically 
stimulated bioluminescence during the dark phase than during the 
light phase. Mechanical stimulation during the dark phase resulted 
in 6.7 flashes.cell-1; flashes were brighter and longer in 
duration than spontaneous flashes. Cruise-collected cells 
exhibited variability in quantum flux with few differences in 
flash kinetics. The role of dinoflagellate spontaneous 
bioluminescence in the dynamics of near-surface oceanic 
communities is unknown, but it may be an important source of 
natural in situ bioluminescence.


Latz, M.I., J.F. Case, and R.L. Gran. 1994. Excitation of 
bioluminescence by laminar fluid shear associated with simple 
Couette flow. Limnology and Oceanography 39: 1424-1439.
The effect of fluid motion on the excitation of bioluminescence 
was examined for cultured dinoflagellates and plankton samples 
subjected to steady-state laminar shear associated with simple 
Couette flow established in the gap between concentric cylinders, 
with only the outer cylinder rotating. The excitation threshold 
for the thecate dinoflagellate, Gonyaulax polyedra, occurred 
at a shear stress of 1 dyn cm^-2. At higher shear stresses light output 
per cell was proportional to pproximately the second power of shear 
stress. At each maintained shear stress, bioluminescence decreased 
exponentially at a rate proportional to the magnitude of shear 
stress. The nonthecate dinoflagellates, Pyrocystis fusiformis and 
P. noctiluca, were more sensitive to stimulation and exhibited an 
order of magnitude higher rate of depletion than for G. polyedra. 
Plankton samples from the Sargasso Sea and eastern Pacific had 
similar excitation thresholds but differed in the slope of the 
intensity vs. shear response most likely due to different 
luminescent populations. The excitation threshold obtained from 
this study is several orders of magnitude greater than oceanic 
shear stress values in the mixed layer, suggesting that ambient 
fluid motion, with the exception of surface breaking waves, does 
not stimulate bioluminescence. 

Abstracts / Updated 4/29/97 / biolum@ucsd.edu