1. LON-CAPA Logo
  2. Help
  3. Log In
 

Resources About Us What's New Notice Board Opinion FAQ Archive Feedback Main
Curricula
Discussion Papers
Handbooks
Lessons Learned
Methods manuals
Regional Activities
Research Techniques
Videos
Working Papers
 

Lecture 1. Overview of issues in ethnobotany, conservation and community development

Summary

Although we have passed the one-hundredth anniversary of ethnobotany (coined in 1896), the golden anniversary of ethnobiology (first used in 1935) and the silver anniversary of ethnoecology (appearing in 1954), there is no consensus on the precise definition of these fields. This is explained in part because of their relatively recent origin and the current surge in their theoretical, conceptual and methodological refinement. Disagreement over definitions is typical of multidisciplinary fields; in the words of Brent Berlin, ethnobiology "combines the intuitions, skills and biases of both the anthropologist and the biologist, often in quite unequal mixtures."

In one sense, ethnobotany, ethnobiology and ethnoecology are new terms for old practices. People have been exploring the usefulness of diverse plants, animals and ecosystems since the dawn of humanity. Documentation of local people's perception of the environment emerged slowly over thousands of years as scholars from many cultural traditions recorded local ways of classifying and using plants and animals. The onset of European colonization of Africa, Asia, the Pacific and the New World gave added impetus to the study of local knowledge of tropical and temperate organisms and ecosystems.

Towards the end of the 19th century, academics began to use the prefix ethno- to refer to the way that indigenous people see the natural world, in contrast to the perspective of natural scientists trained in the Western tradition. They coined terms such as ethnobotany (first used in print by Harshberger in 1896) and ethnozoology to describe these emerging fields of study that crossed the boundaries of natural and social sciences. Interest in traditional environmental knowledge continued apace in the early 20th century, and in 1935 Castetter coined the term ethnobiology, setting as its agenda the systematic analysis of data collected by ethnobotanists and ethnozoologists to achieve a deeper understanding of local peoples’ knowledge and lifestyles. Economic botany gained importance as a parallel field focused on useful plants and the products derived from them. In 1954, Harold Conklin proposed the term ethnoecology, originally conceived as a holistic and integrated approach to understanding local ecological knowledge and practice on their own terms, even while drawing upon the concepts and methods of diverse scientific disciplines. A focus on classificatory systems and the linguistic and anthropological methods used to analyze them gave high visibility to an approach called ethnoscience.

In the 1980s and 1990s, further development of these various lines of research gave rise to new definitions, innovative theoretical orientations and sophisticated qualitative and quantitative methodological approaches applied to local knowledge of the environment. In addition, ethnobiology expanded beyond its original geographical borders as the field gained importance in countries such as China, India and Mexico. There is now a new synthesis emerging – as yet without consensus – that defines ethnobiology as the study of biological sciences as practiced by local people throughout the world, comprising both empirical knowledge (savoir) and technical know-how (savoir-faire), and inclusive of sub-fields such as economic botany, ethnobotany, ethnoecology and ethnozoology.

Although ethnobiology and related fields originated in Europe and the United States, they have now been embraced by researchers in many developing countries who have subsequently adapted the techniques and concepts to their own goals and local conditions. The emergence of professional societies of ethnobotanists in developing countries, ranging from the Indian Society of Ethnobotanists in 1980 to the Asociación Mexicana de Etnobiología in 1993 and the Sociedade Brasileira de Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia in 1997, are evidence of this trend.

The internationalization of ethnobiological research and training has resulted in new directions in theory and application, enriching the field. In India, the tradition of conducting ethnobotanical inventories in various tribal areas has continued, but is now supplemented by innovative approaches to studying the harvest of non-timber forest products in joint forest management schemes and practical strategies to create community biodiversity registers. Researchers in China have contributed studies on ecological succession in swidden fields, marketing of useful plants and analysis of agroforestry practices. Equally impressive are developments in Mexico, where ethnobiologists have focused on the management of anthropogenic and natural ecosystems, as well as the process of domestication of botanical resources.

Definitions:

  • Ethnobotany and ethnozoology are approaches to studying the reciprocal interactions between people and the plants and animals in their local environment. This definition has been criticized as broad and open-ended, but captures the common goals of analyzing traditional biological knowledge and assessing human impact on the environment. These approaches include subfields such as paleoethnobotany and paleoethnozoology, which evaluate archeological evidence on the past interactions between people, plants and animals.
  • Ethnobiology, a term coined in 1935, has been defined as the study of the reciprocal interactions between people and the biological organisms in their local environment, and more recently as the study of biological sciences as practiced in the present and the past by local people throughout the world. Many researchers consider that ethnobiology comprises numerous subfields – such as ethnobotany, ethnoecology, ethnoscience and ethnozoology – but there is as yet no consensus on this point.
  • Ethnoecology is typically defined as the study of local knowledge and management of ecological interactions. More recently, some researchers have proposed an alternate definition, considering ethnoecology as an emerging field that focuses on local peoples’ perception and management of complex and co-evolved relationships between the cultural, ecological and economic components of anthropogenic and natural ecosystems. It is concerned with the interaction between knowledge, practice and production, and is oriented towards applied research on conservation and community development.
  • Economic botany, as originally conceived, was a branch of applied botany that arose during the colonial period to identify and characterize economically important plants and the products derived from them. Currently, it is a scientific endeavor that seeks to document the properties of useful plants through agronomic, archaeological, ecological, ethnobotanical, genetic, historical, phytochemical and other empirical approaches. It overlaps broadly with ethnobiology, as both fields have witnessed a similar development in theory and methodology in recent years.
  • Ethnoscience arose as a minor subfield of ethnography concerned with recording in great detail local peoples’ knowledge of biological organisms and the physical environment. Later, the term came to be used in a more restricted sense by cognitive and linguistic anthropologists to refer to local classificatory systems (as an object of study) and their semantic analysis (as a methodological approach). In France, the term is used to refer to ethnobiological studies in general.

Basic readings:

Alexiades, M.N. 1996. Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanical Research: A Field Manual. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.

Atran, S. 1990. Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Balée, W. 1994. Footprints of the Forest. Ka'apor Ethnobotany – The Historical Ecology of Plant Utilization by an Amazonian People. Columbia University Press, New York.

Balick, M.J. and P. A. Cox. 1996. Plants, People and Culture: The Science of Ethnobotany. Scientific American, New York.

Berlin, B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Cotton, C.M 1996. Ethnobotany. Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, London.

Ellen, R.F., P.S.C. Parkes and A. Bicker, editors. 2000. Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations. Studies in Environmental Anthropology. Harwood, Amsterdam.

Issues in People and Plants

Many of the basic issues of applied ethnobotany are explored in the People and Plants Handbook, a source of information on applying ethnobotany to conservation and community development. It is designed for people who work in the field, including park managers, foresters, students, researchers, cultural promoters, and members of non-governmental, governmental and indigenous organizations. An overview of the following issues, illustrated by slides from diverse projects around the world, provides a general introduction to the subjects to be covered in the course.

  1. Keeping in Touch: Journals, Networks, Newsletters, Organizations and Professional Societies
  2. Protecting Rights and Resources: the Ethics of Ethnobiology
  3. Returning Results: Community and Environmental Education
  4. Measuring Diversity: Methods of Assessing Biological Resources and Local Knowledge
  5. Cultivating Forests: the Evolution of Agroforestry Systems
  6. Managing Resources: Community Forestry Initiatives
  7. Growing Diversity: Crop Genetic Resources
  8. Healing the World: Ecology, Cultural Transition and the Health of Local Peoples
  9. Reading the Landscape: Cultural Perspectives and Geographical Information Systems
  10. Supporting Projects: Grant Writing and Foundations
  11. Feeding the World: Food and Nutrition from Non-Cultivated Plants
  12. Greening the Earth: Ecological Restoration and management in Arid and Semi-Arid Zones
  13. Harvesting the Forest: Non-Timber Forest Products and Extractivism
  14. Inheriting Knowledge: Culture, Conservation and Development
  15. Getting Organized: Non-Governmental and Indigenous Organizations
  16. Travelling Green: Cultural, Ecological and Scientific Tourism
  17. Taking Stock: Resource Inventories, Systematics and Ethnobiological Classification
  18. Planting Seeds: Ethnobotanical Gardens, Local Registries and Germplasm Banks
  19. Valuing Plants: Ecological Economics and Ethnobotany
  20. Crafting the Future: Cultural continuity and resource sustainability of plant-based artefacts

BACK

 
| ResourcesAbout Us  |  What's New  |  Notice Board Opinion  |  FAQ   |  Archive  |  Feedback  |  Main  |
WWF Logo Unesco Logo Kew Logo
People and Plants Online website manager: Gary J. Martin,B.P. 262, 40008 Marrakech-Medina, Marrakech, Morocco;
Fax +212.4.329544, e-mail
peopleandplants@cybernet.net.ma
Website design & maintenance by
RAM Production Sdn. Bhd.
People and Plants Online © WWF, UNESCO and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew
Disclaimer
Links to other websites cited in People and Plants Online do not imply endorsement of these sites or their content
by the People and Plants Initiative or its sponsoring institutions